Wednesday, September 14, 2011

foreclosure statistics


Investing in Communites launch by Big Lottery Fund


You've no doubt seen them or read them. Glossy advertisements or four-color propagates in publications and papers promising to teach you all of the juicy information about successful real-estate investing. And all you need to do to learn all these real estate investing surface encounters chuck russo secrets is to pay a rather high sum for a one-or two-day seminar.




Often these kinds of slick property investing classes claim that you could make smart, profitable property investments with simply no money lower (with the exception of, of program, the significant fee you pay for the class). Now, how appealing is in which? Make a benefit from real est investments you created using no cash. Possible? Not likely.




Successful owning a home requires cash flow. That's the character of any type of business or investment, especially real estate investing. You put your money into something which you desire and plan is likely to make you additional money.




Unfortunately not enough newbies towards the world of property investing believe that it's a magical form of business in which standard business rules do not apply. Simply put, if you want to stay in real estate investing for a lot more than, say, a day or 2, then you will have to generate money to make use of and commit.




While it could be true in which buying property with no money down is easy, anyone who's even made a fundamental owning a home (such as buying their particular home) knows there's a lot more involved in real estate investing that will set you back money. For example, what concerning any necessary repairs?




So, the number one rule people new to real property investing ought to remember is to have accessible cash stores. Before you determine to actually do any real-estate investing, save some cash. Having slightly money within the bank when you begin real est investing surface encounters chuck russo can help you make more profitable real estate investments in rental properties, for example.




When real-estate investing in rental properties, you'll want to be able to select only qualified tenants. If you've no income when real-estate investing in rental qualities, you might be pressured to take in a a smaller amount qualified tenant as you need somebody to pay for you money so that you can take care of fixes or attorney at law fees.




For almost any real property investing, meaning local rental properties or perhaps properties you buy to resell, having funds reserved can permit you to ask to get a higher price. You can ask for a greater price out of your owning a home because you surface encounters chuck russo won't feel financially strapped as you wait for an offer. You won't be backed into a corner and forced to accept just any offer because you desperately need the money.




Another downfall of numerous new to real estate investing is, well, greed. Make the profit, yes, but don't become thus greedy that you simply ask regarding ridiculous local rental or second-hand rates on many real est investments.




Those not used to real property investing have to see property investing like a business, NOT a hobby. Don't believe that real estate investing will make you wealthy overnight. What business does?




It requires about half a year to decide if property investing set for you. If you've decided which, hey I enjoy this, then offer yourself a few years to really start earning profits. It usually takes at the very least five years to become truly prosperous in property investing.




Persistence may be the key in order to success in property investing. If you have decided that real estate investing is made for you, surface encounters chuck russo keep plugging away at it and the rewards will be greater than you imagined.












(h/t Heather at VideoCafe)


It is a truism rarely acknowledged in this country: the single most important infrastructure investment we can make for the future is in education. I'm not talking about retrofitting the buildings or constructing more classrooms. No, we provide for the future by educating our young people, preparing them to become productive members of society. Study after study shows that the higher one's education level is, the higher the median income and the less likely one is to suffer unemployment.


But we're not doing that. No, in these austerity times, politicians clamor to cut services and jobs. Teachers are demonized. Vouchers are touted as the answer, when it's simply a way to privatize profits away from public schools. Hell, some GOP would be happy if we eliminate the Department of Education altogether.


A rare and welcome progressive appearance on the Sunday shows, Rep. Maxine Waters bemoans the disconnect between what politicians say we need to focus on and what they're really doing about it:


To tell you the truth, the plight of education in this country is shameful. Just a few days ago I learned that more cities, more states are reducing the number of education days down to four instead of five. And I could not help but stop and think, "Is this America? Is this the country that said and continues to say that education is a top priority?" Why are we not investing more in education? Why do we have dropouts? Why do we have educational systems that are failing? Why is it that we have a situation where many of our young people will not be able to compete in this high technological society because they're not properly educated? And so, no, we do pay lip service to education. We don't really invest in it, and that's got to change. But let me just say this, Americans want to work. This joblessness is not only hitting the middle class, but it is hitting all classes. It is absolutely unconscionable what is happening in the minority communities. When we look at this no jobs haven't been created in August and we find in the African-American community it has increased from 16 percent, 15.9, 16 percent, up now 16.7 percent, and now we're going to talk about cutting government by $1.5 trillion, this new 12 committee membership that we have after the raising the debt ceiling debate? And that means that we're going to lose more jobs, that means more people are going to be unemployed. The African-American rate will probably go up to about 20 percent. I don't know how our country can sustain that kind of...


Of course, David Gregory interrupts her at this point, because Lord know, the plight of the African American community doesn't concern him. But then again, he has the gall to say that we only play lip service to the importance of education. You know, the same guy who only pays lip service to journalism and who spent the better part of the last two years telling his viewers that Americans cared about the deficit when poll after poll proved him a lying hack with a corporate agenda.



Warren Buffett just announced that he's making a landmark investment, $5 billion, in Bank of America.


Bank of America was facing a free-falling stock price and a number of criticisms, including that it did not have enough capital, and that its assets were not worth what it claimed.


Now thanks to Buffett, that will certainly change.


When similar investments were made in Citi and in Goldman Sachs, by Prince Alwaleed and Warren Buffett, in 1990 and 2008, respectively, the stocks experienced long term gains. 


And get this - he says he dreamt up the idea to invest in Bank of America in the bathtub on Tuesday. He liked it, so he called Moynihan on Wednesday morning. The entire story of how it happened is available in a video embedded below, as told to Becky Quick by Buffett.


The story (and the mental image) is amusing but also important - it suggests that the Obama Administration and/or the Treasury, did not have a hand in the agreement.


And to make it very clear that Treasury or Obama had no hand in the arrangement, which makes the news even better for Bank of America.


So does this - the deal is expensive for Buffett, and a good deal for Bank of America. He says in some ways, it's better than the deal he gave to Goldman Sachs in 2008.


But obviously, it's a great deal for Buffett.


Buffett's investment alone is now worth $700 million more than it was when he bought it.




No comments:

Post a Comment